A Decade of Daubert
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Predicting the coefficients of the Daubert and Danner correlation using a neural network model
In the present research, three different architectures were investigated to predict the coefficients of the Daubert and Danner equation for calculation of saturated liquid density. The first architecture with 4 network input parameters including critical temperature, critical pressure, critical volume and molecular weight, the second architecture with 6 network input parameters including the on...
متن کاملTen years after Daubert: the status of the states.
This paper examines how many of the states have changed their respective scientific-evidence admissibility standards under the influence of the United States Supreme Court's 1993 Daubert decision. The authors offer a definition of what constitutes a Daubert state, and using this definition classify the fifty states into three categories. These are: Frye states (15 states, 10 with codified evide...
متن کاملDoes Anyone Get Stopped at the Gate? An Empirical Assessment of the Daubert Trilogy in the States
The Supreme Court’s trilogy of evidence cases, Daubert, Joiner, and Kumho Tire appear to mark a significant departure in the way scientific and expert evidence is handled in federal court. By focusing on the underlying methods used to generate the experts’ conclusions, Daubert has the potential to impose a more rigorous standard on experts. Given this potential, some individuals have called for...
متن کامل1 of 2 DOCUMENTS
WITHIN THIS PAST DECADE, there have been more challenges to the admissibility of expert testimony than ever before. The trigger for this flurry of activity was Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), which has already changed the way many cases involving mental issues are litigated. At this time, a substantial majority of states follow the federal standard. A minority...
متن کاملExpert Testimony in Criminal Proceedings: Questions Daubert Does Not Answer
I strongly believe that we need a very stringent standard of proof in criminal cases. I do not think, however, that Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has been productive in effectuating this goal. In civil cases, courts engage in rigorous gatekeeping and often exclude plaintiffs’ experts because the theory underlying their testimony has not been adequately validated. But I see no sig...
متن کامل